Case 1806668/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Perry v Trinity Construction Management Limited Heard Remotely, by CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806668/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Perry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions in the net sum of £3,082.28. It also found a breach of the duty to give the claimant a written statement of initial particulars of employment and awarded 2 weeks' pay of £1,142 for that breach.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant had not completed the qualifying period for unfair dismissal, having started employment on 26 October 2020 and his employment ending on 3 October 2022. The wrongful dismissal claim was also dismissed because the tribunal found that the employment ended by the claimant's resignation and that he was not entitled to notice in the circumstances.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant had taken 1 day of holiday in excess of his pro rata entitlement in the holiday year in which his employment ended, but there was no relevant agreement permitting the respondent to recover holiday pay for that day. The respondent's contract claim was withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in the net sum of £3,082.28 and ordered that sum to be paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £3,082 |
| Other | The tribunal found a breach of the duty to give the claimant a written statement of initial particulars of employment and awarded 2 weeks' pay of £1,142. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had started employment on 26 October 2020 and it ended on 3 October 2022, so he did not have the qualifying period to bring the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed because the employment ended by the claimant's resignation and he was not entitled to notice in the circumstances. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the claimant took 1 day of holiday in excess of his pro rata entitlement in the holiday year in which his employment ended, and there was no relevant agreement to entitle the respondent to repayment of holiday pay for that day. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract claim was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,224
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.