Case 1806676/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Grove (solicitor) This has been a remote hearing by CVP. A face to face hearing was not held because of the present Covid 19 circumstances. — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806676/2020
- Decision date
- 18 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages at a remote CVP hearing before Employment Judge JM Wade on 17 June 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Grove, solicitor.
The complaint succeeded. The judgment ordered Thetford Limited to pay the claimant the gross sum of 180, which the extracted text renders as 'El 80'. No further factual findings or separate remedy components are set out in the supplied text.
The judgment notes that reasons for the decision were given at the time of the hearing, and that any request for typed written reasons had to be made in writing within 14 days of the sending of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment states that the respondent shall pay the claimant the gross sum of 'El 80'. This appears to be an OCR rendering of £180, but the amount is ambiguous in the supplied text. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £180
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.