Case 1806677/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Ashworth v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806677/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss G Ashworth
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss G Ashworth did not attend the hearing at Leeds via CVP on 19 April 2024 and was not represented. The tribunal recorded that she had been sent notice of the hearing and a link to join remotely, but had not contacted the tribunal to explain her non-attendance and had not complied with directions to serve evidence.
Employment Judge Moxon dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not contain findings on the substance of the underlying unlawful deduction from wages complaint, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing, did not contact the tribunal to explain her absence, and had not complied with directions to serve evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.