Case 1806683/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Dudley v Deneka-Jo Molinari HELD by CVP at Leeds — 2025
- Case reference
- 1806683/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Dudley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs H Dudley, brought claims for redundancy payment and notice pay against Deneka-Jo Molinari. The respondent did not appear, was not represented, and did not file a response. The tribunal first resolved the identity of the respondent, finding on the evidence that the correct name was Deneka-Jo Molinari.
On the redundancy claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was made redundant on 23 March 2024. It accepted that she had worked in the public house since 23 November 2011, that her gross weekly wage was £145.88, and that she was 61 years old at the date of termination. Applying those facts, the tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment and fixed that award at £2,625.84.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice but had received only 2 weeks' notice. It therefore held that 10 weeks remained unpaid at the claimant's gross weekly rate of £145.88, producing an award of £1,458.80. The judgment recorded a total amount payable of £4,084.64, made up of the redundancy payment and the outstanding notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was made redundant on 23 March 2024 and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated by reference to her weekly wage, 12 years' service and the age-related multiplier. | Upheld | — | £2,626 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice, had been paid only 2 weeks, and therefore had 10 weeks' notice pay outstanding. The judgment did not label this head of claim as unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,459 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,085
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.