Case 1806710/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Fenwick and Mr N Yu v Imperial Catering Services Ltd t/a George Wright Boutique Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806710/2022
- Decision date
- 10 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Fenwick and Mr N Yu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard evidence from both claimants and reviewed documents including Mr Fenwick’s contract, payslips, redundancy notice and emails, and Mr Yu’s payslips and emails. The respondent did not attend, but the tribunal was satisfied it had notice of the hearing. The claim was brought as a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages under sections 13 and 23(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the employer of both claimants was Imperial Catering Services Ltd. That conclusion was based on Mr Casson’s role, the express term in Mr Fenwick’s contract, and emails referring to the company, including Mr Fenwick’s redundancy notice. It also found that the papers for the hearing had been served at the hotel address and at Imperial Catering Services Ltd’s registered office.
For Mr Fenwick, the tribunal found that he worked as a night porter from 1 October 2021 to 10 November 2022 and was made redundant by email on 10 November 2022. He had been issued a payslip on 7 November 2022 for £1,290, but that amount was never paid. The tribunal found that he was entitled to that sum and that the failure to pay it was an unauthorised deduction from wages.
For Mr Yu, the tribunal found that he worked as a waiter from 9 October 2021 until his resignation on 24 September 2022. He typically received about £600 per month, should have received a payslip of about £600 on 5 October 2022, and later received a payslip for £83.60 on 5 November 2022. Neither amount was paid. The tribunal found that he was entitled to £683.60 in wages due and owing, and that the non-payment was an unauthorised deduction from wages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Fenwick: unpaid wages corresponding to the 7 November 2022 payslip. | Upheld | — | £1,290 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Yu: unpaid wages due and owing, including the amounts referred to in the October 2022 and 5 November 2022 payslips. | Upheld | — | £684 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,974
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23(1)(a) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.