Case 1806718/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Francis v M and N Commodities Ltd t/a Premier Metals — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806718/2021
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr G Harker, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Francis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 15 and 16 June 2022, before Employment Judge JM Wade sitting with Mr G Harker and Mr M Brewer, the tribunal dismissed all of Miss N Francis’s complaints against M and N Commodities Ltd t/a Premier Metals. The judgment records dismissals of the constructive unfair and wrongful dismissal complaints, the redundancy payment complaint, the complaints about underpaid holiday and furlough pay, and the complaints of Employment Rights Act detriment and Equality Act unfavourable treatment because of maternity leave.
The supplied text contains only the tribunal’s dispositive orders and does not set out further findings or a monetary award. No remedy was recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the dismissal complaints as unfair and wrongful dismissal (constructive); those complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint, described in the judgment as constructive, was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal complaint, described in the judgment as constructive, was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The complaint of entitlement to a redundancy payment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint about alleged underpaid holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint about alleged furlough pay underpayment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Employment Rights Act detriment complaint because of maternity leave was dismissed. | Dismissed | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.