Case 1806723/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Hall v Independent Foster Carers Alliance Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) C/O Lesley Gray — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806723/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the proceedings had been stayed in March 2021 because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation. The claimant was told that she would need permission from a court to continue with the claim, and that she would later be asked whether she had applied for permission.
By letter dated 16 September 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make any representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying claim, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The proceedings had previously been stayed in March 2021 after the respondent entered compulsory liquidation, and the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 16 September 2021 or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.