Case 1806724/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Jowett v Multi Clean Supplies Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1806724/2019
- Decision date
- 30 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Jowett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claimant, Ms S Jowett, succeeded on two claims against Multi Clean Supplies Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay the claimant the gross sum of £425.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £425 in respect of that claim. The judgment does not set out any further findings, legal analysis, or separate breakdown of the awards beyond those two sums.
The hearing listed for 15 January 2020 was cancelled. The judgment was sent to the parties on 30 December 2019, and no panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £425. | Upheld | — | £425 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £425. | Upheld | — | £425 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £850
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.