Case 1806727/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MH Waheed v Ruby Security Limited. AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806727/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MH Waheed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing after being notified on 8 November 2023 that it would proceed, and the tribunal dealt with the case in his absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent was represented by its director. The tribunal recorded that the respondent admitted an unauthorised deduction from wages and an unpaid holiday pay liability.
On the wages claim, the tribunal ordered payment of £413.25 gross for 43.5 hours worked between 24 July and 14 August 2022 at £9.50 per hour. The award was made without any purported but unnotified deduction for mileage. On the holiday pay claim, the tribunal ordered payment of £52.44 gross, being the amount calculated by the respondent for accrued holiday pay up to the pleaded termination date of 14 August 2022.
The tribunal found that there was no failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment, so there was no uplift under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The only dismissal claim before the tribunal was an automatically unfair dismissal claim under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
That dismissal claim was dismissed. The tribunal said the burden of proof was on the claimant, and he had provided no evidence that he was dismissed, whether on the pleaded termination date or at all, or that the reason or principal reason for any dismissal was that he had alleged an infringement of a statutory right. The total monetary award recorded on the judgment is £465.69 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an admitted unauthorised deduction from wages for 43.5 hours worked between 24 July and 14 August 2022 at £9.50 per hour, and ordered payment of £413.25 gross without any purported but unnotified mileage deduction. | Upheld | — | £413 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent admitted failing to pay accrued holiday pay up to the pleaded termination date of 14 August 2022, and was ordered to pay £52.44 gross as calculated by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £52 |
| Unfair dismissal | This was pleaded as automatically unfair dismissal under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal dismissed it because the claimant provided no evidence that he had been dismissed, whether on the pleaded termination date or at all, or that any dismissal was because he had alleged an infringement of a statutory right. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £466
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.