Case 1806729/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806729/2021
- Decision date
- 14 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Douglas Hospitality Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs Bloom's wages. It ordered the Respondent to pay £89.10 for that deduction.
The Tribunal also ordered the Respondent to pay a further £837.52 for failure to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. The Respondent did not attend or have representation at the hearing, and reasons were given orally.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and was ordered to pay £89.10. | Upheld | — | £89 |
| Other | The judgment separately ordered £837.52 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; this does not map directly to a more specific locked claim type. | Upheld | — | £838 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £927
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.