Case 1806731/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wilby v Garrison Security Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806731/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Armstrong Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wilby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal by CVP on 5 April 2023 before Employment Judge K Armstrong. The claimant, Mr A Wilby, attended in person. The respondent, The Garrison Security Group (GSG) Ltd, did not attend.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Wilby the gross sum of £900 in respect of wages unlawfully deducted.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. No further findings or separate remedy components are recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £900. | Upheld | — | £900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.