Case 1806736/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Hopkins v Imperial Catering Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806736/2021
- Decision date
- 18 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Hopkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Hopkins brought claims against Imperial Catering Services Ltd. The respondent did not present a response, and Employment Judge Cox determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment amended the respondent's name to Imperial Catering Services Ltd.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to give her notice of termination of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £360 for that breach. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for accrued holiday entitlement due on termination of employment, and it ordered payment of £168.30 for that sum. The listed hearing on 8 March 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to give notice of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement due on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £168 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £528
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.