Case 1806748/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Harland v Mr B Hanby — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806748/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Harland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Harland brought claims relating to accrued but untaken holiday entitlement at the termination of her employment and to a statutory redundancy payment. The hearing took place at Leeds by CVP on 29 March 2023 before Employment Judge Maidment.
The holiday entitlement claim was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of it. The tribunal therefore recorded no merits finding on that issue.
The redundancy payment claim failed because the tribunal found that the claimant unreasonably refused an offer of suitable alternative employment. On that basis, it held that she was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement as at termination was dismissed upon her withdrawal of it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment because she unreasonably refused an offer of suitable alternative employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.