Case 1806749/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Robinson v Semper Contracting Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806749/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 7 December 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response by 1 February 2023, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Semper Contracting Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr M Robinson’s wages and/or breached his employment contract. The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay Mr Robinson £1,275.88 gross. The judgment does not separate the award between the wage deduction and contract breach aspects of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and/or breached the employment contract, but it does not split the award between the two causes of action. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and/or breached the employment contract, but it does not split the award between the two causes of action. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,276
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.