Case 1806753/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Halliday v Calder Valley Marine (Inns) Ltd Heard: In Leeds by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806753/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mrs L Anderson-Coe, Mr DW Fields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Halliday
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Leeds by CVP on 31 October to 2 November 2022 before Employment Judge JM Wade, Mrs L Anderson-Coe and Mr DW Fields. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Evans-Jarvis, consultant. The judgment records that claim number 1806664/2021 was dismissed on withdrawal after the parties had reached agreement as to notice pay and holiday pay, and that the claimant's Equality Act complaints were dismissed.
The written record supplied does not set out any further factual findings or legal reasoning beyond those outcomes. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim number 1806664/2021 was dismissed on withdrawal after the parties had reached agreement as to notice pay and holiday pay. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's Equality Act complaints were dismissed and gives no further reasons in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's Equality Act complaints were dismissed and gives no further reasons in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.