Case 1806754/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Boyd First v Lee Staveley (trading as LJS Transport) Second Respondent: LJS Transport of Settle Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806754/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Boyd First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded. It ordered the respondents to pay £1,424.50 for work undertaken by the claimant between 21 September and 9 October 2020.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £587.50 in respect of 5 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay owed to the claimant for the period up to 9 October 2020. The total gross sum owed was recorded as £2,012.00, and the judgment states that the sum should be paid on or before 11 February 2020, which appears inconsistent with the decision date shown in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards £1,424.50 for work undertaken between 21 September and 9 October 2020 and £587.50 for 5 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay up to 9 October 2020. The extracted text states the total as '£2,012,00', which appears to be a typographical error; the component sums total £2,012.00. The text also states payment is due 'on or before 11 February 2020', which is inconsistent with the decision date of 1 February 2021 as extracted. | Upheld | — | £2,012 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,012
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.