Case 1806760/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Parker v Bonmarche Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806760/2019
- Decision date
- 15 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found that Mrs N Parker was unfairly dismissed and ordered Bonmarche Limited (in administration) to pay a compensatory award of £4,876.96.
The Tribunal also declared that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It made a protective award requiring the respondent to pay remuneration to the claimant, who was dismissed as redundant on 29 October 2019, for a period of 90 days beginning on 29 October 2019.
No basic award, interest, breach of contract award, redundancy payment, or quantified total award is stated in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only a compensatory award for unfair dismissal; no basic award is stated. | Upheld | — | £4,877 |
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment awards 90 days' remuneration from 29 October 2019 but does not state a monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.