Case 1806765/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Stevenson v Mr J Hunt T/a Granelli’s — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806765/2019
- Decision date
- 2 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant, Mr P Stevenson, had been employed by Mr J Hunt T/a Granelli’s from 3 October 2002 as a delivery driver and general warehouse worker, and rejected the respondent’s case that there had been breaks in continuity. It found that the respondent was a small employer with poor record-keeping, no contract or written particulars, and that the claimant’s working week remained 30 hours for the relevant period.
On the evidence, the tribunal found a persistent failure to pay wages in full and on time, worsening in 2019. It relied on the absence of proper payroll records and payslips after April 2019, the contemporaneous note from Mrs Hunt apologising that only £50 was available on one occasion, and evidence that payments were often made irregularly, including arranged meetings to hand over cash. It held that the payment of wages was an obligation at the heart of the employment relationship and that this persistent failure amounted to a fundamental breach.
The tribunal found that the claimant resigned on 19 September 2019 in response to that repudiatory breach, so he was constructively dismissed. His later return to work on 24 September 2019, after Mrs Hunt promised that wages would be paid properly, did not retrospectively affirm the earlier breach. The tribunal also found that the dismissal was unfair because the claimant had the necessary qualifying service and the respondent did not advance a fair reason. The dismissal was wrongful as well, because no notice or payment in lieu was given, and damages were assessed at the statutory minimum notice period of 12 weeks.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint for £615 of wage arrears and £225 for holiday taken in August 2019. The separate holiday pay complaint failed insofar as it related to a claimed future November week off after employment had ended. It also made a higher award of £900 under Employment Act 2002 section 38 because no written statement of particulars had been provided. The total payable was £9,327.50, and the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found a fundamental breach from the respondent's persistent failure to pay wages in full and on time, and held that the claimant's resignation on 19 September 2019 accepted that breach. Later re-employment from 24 September 2019 did not retrospectively affirm the earlier breach. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant had continuous service from 3 October 2002 and therefore qualifying service. The dismissal was unfair because the respondent did not advance a fair reason. The award comprised a basic award of £4,387.50 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £4,888 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Because the claimant was dismissed without notice or payment in lieu, the dismissal was wrongful. Damages were assessed at 12 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,700 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that £615 of wage arrears and £225 for holiday taken in August 2019 had not been paid, making a total award of £840. | Upheld | — | £840 |
| Holiday pay | The separate holiday pay complaint failed in relation to the claimant's claimed November week off, which was prospective and post-dated the termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal made a higher award under Employment Act 2002 section 38 because no written statement of particulars or contract of employment had been provided. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,328
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,388
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Western Excavating (ECC) Limited v Sharp [1978] ICR 221
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2019] ICR 1
- Employment Rights Act 1996, section 86
- Employment Act 2002, section 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.