Case 1806765/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Goldsmith v Alliance Valves Group U.K. Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806765/2021
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Goldsmith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim was issued on 4 January 2022 and that the first respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge JM Wade decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 on the information on the file, including the second respondent's response.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,864.73 net to the claimant.
The listed video hearing on 25 February 2022 was retained to consider the second respondent's application for the claim against it to be struck out, so the judgment does not record a final outcome of that application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment against the first respondent. The hearing was retained to consider the second respondent's application for strike out, so no final determination against the second respondent is extracted. | Upheld | — | £2,865 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,865
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.