Case 1806774/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Bennett v Iceland Food stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806774/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders dated 24 March 2023, sent to the parties on 30 March 2023, the tribunal gave Miss S Bennett an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing by 7 April 2023. The tribunal explained that the allegations of a failure to make reasonable adjustments relating to paid break times, a referral to occupational health, and a move to a different location were being considered for strike out on the basis that they had no reasonable prospects of success.
Miss S Bennett did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out those parts of the claim. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims were unaffected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Allegations of a failure to make reasonable adjustments relating to paid break times, a referral to occupational health, and a move to a different location were struck out after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's case management orders. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.