Case 1806779/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Armitt v Deesignr Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1806779/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Armitt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss R Armitt. The tribunal recorded that the First Respondent, Deesignr Ltd, had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages.
The only substantive order in the judgment was that the First Respondent pay the Claimant £8,464.45. The judgment also amended the name of the Second Respondent to DTC Clear Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), but it did not record any separate liability or award against that respondent.
No further reasoning, legal test, or itemised remedy breakdown was set out in the extracted judgment text. The decision was sent to the parties on 19 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The First Respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages. The Second Respondent's name was amended to DTC Clear Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), but no substantive order was made against it. | Upheld | — | £8,464 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,464
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.