Case 1806788/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs L McManamin v Impact Education Multi Academy Trust and 2 others — 2022

Case reference: 1806788/2021
Decision date: 29 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mrs L McManamin

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the preliminary hearing on 29 November 2022 before Employment Judge D N Jones, the respondents' application to strike out the claim was dismissed. The judgment is procedural and does not contain any merits findings on the underlying dispute.

The order also records that, save for the claims identified in the list of issues sent to the Tribunal on 18 November 2022 and the rulings on amendment in respect of that document made at the hearing, all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim types.

No remedy or compensation figure is recorded in this judgment text. The record therefore shows only the dismissal of the strike-out application and the withdrawal-based disposal of the remaining claims referenced in paragraph 1.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	This records the respondents' application to strike out the claim, which was dismissed at the preliminary hearing. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive claims by type; paragraph 1 also states that, save for the claims identified in the list of issues and the amendment rulings made on 29 November 2022, all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.