Case 1806788/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Wallace v ESG Trading Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806788/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Wallace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 13 December 2022. The judgment records that the respondent did not provide representations in response to the wages claim, and that the response to that claim was dismissed under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 unless the respondent explained why it should not be dismissed by 16 February 2023. The text then states that the response to the wages claim stood dismissed on 10 March 2023.
The tribunal went on to determine the wages claim under rule 21 and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1000,00, which is recorded here as £1,000.00. No other claims or remedy heads are identified in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1000,00. The amount is treated as £1,000.00, but the punctuation in the source is unusual. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.