Case 1806798/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Russell Jones v Outspire Media Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806798/2021
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Elliott
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Russell Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Russell Jones brought claims against Outspire Media Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday pay accrued to termination, and a statutory redundancy payment. The hearing was before Employment Judge G Elliott sitting alone at Leeds on 18 March 2022, and the Respondent did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint in respect of unauthorised deductions (unpaid wages). It upheld the complaint in respect of holiday accrued to termination of employment and ordered the Respondent to pay £2,307.75 gross, subject to applicable deductions for tax and employee national insurance contributions.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,679.24. No separate award was recorded for the dismissed unpaid wages complaint. The total of the monetary awards recorded in the judgment is £4,986.99.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant's complaint in respect of unauthorised deductions (unpaid wages) failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Claimant's complaint in respect of holiday accrued to termination of employment was upheld. The Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £2,307.75, subject to applicable deductions for tax and employee national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,679.24. | Upheld | — | £2,679 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,987
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.