Case 1806815/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wood v Eco Valley Mechanical Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806815/2021
- Decision date
- 7 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millns Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with two unlawful deduction from wages claims. The first, concerning an alleged failure to pay the national minimum wage for the period 15 September 2021 to 15 October 2021, was dismissed.
The second claim, concerning one week's pay for 18 October 2021 to 22 October 2021, succeeded. The respondent, Eco Valley Mechanical Limited, was ordered to pay the claimant, Mr J Wood, the gross sum of £334.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction claim concerning failure to pay the national minimum wage for the period 15/9/21 to 15/10/21 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction claim concerning one week's pay for 18/10/21 to 22/10/21 succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £334.40. | Upheld | — | £334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £334
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.