Case 1806828/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Summers, lay representative v Mr Williams, consultant — 2025
- Case reference
- 1806828/2024
- Decision date
- 17 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Summers, lay representative
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge JM Wade, sitting alone by CVP on 10 February 2025, heard the claim of Mr S Geczy against Chasing Change Ltd trading as Remedy Coffee Shop. By consent the claim was amended to correctly identify the respondent. The Tribunal found that the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages complaint succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay £767.24 in unpaid wages, £80.73 for consequential NEST pension loss at 3% under Section 24(2), and £2,592.66 representing 21 days' gross unpaid holiday on termination of employment, totalling £3,440.63. The Tribunal made a further award of two weeks' gross pay (£1,218.14) for the respondent's failure to provide a Section 1 Statement of Employment Particulars.
The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant is £4,658.77. The judgment noted there was no written application for a preparation time order to which the respondent could sensibly respond on the day, and set out the procedural requirements (Rules 74(2), 75 and 77) for any such future application.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Comprises £767.24 unpaid wages, £80.73 consequential NEST pension loss at 3% (Section 24(2)), and £2,592.66 for 21 days' gross unpaid holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £3,441 |
| Other | Award of two weeks' gross pay for the respondent's failure to provide a Section 1 Statement of Employment Particulars. Not a standalone enum value in the locked taxonomy; classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £1,218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,659
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Section 24(2)
- Section 1 Statement of Employment Particulars
- Rule 74(2)
- Rule 75
- Rule 77
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.