Case 1806838/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Goodman v Bm Retail Limited T/a Bonmarché — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806838/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Goodman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 August 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs K Goodman an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 18 August 2021. The judgment does not record any liability findings on the underlying dispute and does not set out any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text does not itemise the pleaded causes of action; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The decision states only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not itemise the pleaded causes of action; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The decision states only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.