Case 1806840/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Jedrzejczak v Cast Iron Radiators Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806840/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Jedrzejczak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held remotely by CVP on 4 and 12 February 2021 before Employment Judge Buckley, with the parties consenting to a remote hearing. The written record states that the claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim for failure to provide a section 1 statement. No separate monetary award or remedy is recorded in the written judgment for either dismissed claim.
The written record states that judgment on the claim for unlawful deductions in respect of holiday pay was reserved. The extract supplied does not contain a final determination or any award on that issue, and the written reasons were to be sent separately if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a section 1 statement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment on the unlawful deductions (holiday pay) claim was reserved. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.