Case 1806841/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Earl v Vehicle Control Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806841/2019
- Decision date
- 27 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Earl
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages. The decision was given by Employment Judge Maidment at Leeds by telephone on 27 May 2020, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by its director, Mr M Atwood.
The written record contains the dispositive order only and does not set out detailed reasons, because reasons had been given orally at the hearing. On that basis, the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was upheld and the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £1,314.19, with deductions for tax and National Insurance to be made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,314.19, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,314 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,314
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.