Case 1806844/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. B Przyborowski v Cast Iron Radiators Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806844/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. B Przyborowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 and 12 February 2021, Employment Judge Buckley recorded that the claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed. The same judgment also dismissed the claim for failure to provide a section 1 statement. The extracted text does not set out any further factual findings or reasoning for those dismissals.
The judgment further states that the judgment on the claim for unlawful deductions in respect of holiday pay was reserved. No final decision or remedy is recorded in the supplied extract for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for failure to provide a s 1 statement is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim for unlawful deductions (holiday pay) was reserved, so no final outcome is given in this extract. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.