Case 1806848/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Bowers v Desire Cakes and Shakes Limited AT A HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806848/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Bowers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend. Its application for an extension of time to serve a response was refused, and the case proceeded in its absence under rules 21 and 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 on the claimant's sworn evidence. The tribunal amended the respondent's title to Desire Cakes and Shakes Limited.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal because the claimant did not have the necessary 2 years' continuous employment. The tribunal also allowed the claim to be amended to include unauthorised deductions from wages, but any claim for £75 allegedly owing from a previous period of employment was dismissed upon withdrawal as out of time.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that the claimant worked four 5-hour shifts between 15 and 18 October 2020 and was paid £120, leaving £9 unpaid at the applicable National Minimum Wage rate of £6.45 per hour. It also found that she worked 35.5 hours between 19 and 24 October 2020 but was paid for only 21 hours on 19 January 2021. The tribunal declared unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £102.53 gross. It further found that no written statement of terms and conditions had been provided and made an additional award of two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, calculated as £387, so the total monetary award recorded was £489.53.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal because the claimant did not have the necessary 2 years' continuous employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal allowed amendment to include unauthorised deductions from wages. It dismissed the separate £75 element alleged from an earlier period of employment as withdrawn and out of time, but found underpayments for work between 15 and 24 October 2020 and ordered payment of £102.53 gross. | Upheld | — | £103 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £490
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- 2 years' continuous employment
- rules 21 and 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.