Case 1806851/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Hodge v Mason Pub Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806851/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge IP Evans
- Panel members
- Mrs L Hill, Mr D Dorman-Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Hodge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 May 2021 before Employment Judge IP Evans, Mrs L Hill and Mr D Dorman-Smith, the tribunal dealt with two claims brought by Mrs R Hodge against Mason Pub Limited. The written judgment records that the claimant's breach of contract claim, pleaded as wrongful dismissal, was withdrawn after she had been paid the notice monies due to her, and the tribunal dismissed that claim following the withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's allegation that her dismissal was an act of direct age discrimination failed. That claim was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract (wrongful dismissal) claim was dismissed following its withdrawal by the claimant after she was paid the notice monies due to her. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The claimant's claim that her dismissal was an act of direct age discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.