Case 1806858/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Thompson and Others (see attached schedule) v Continental Installations Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806858/2019
- Decision date
- 8 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Thompson and Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal dismissed the claims for notice pay and statutory redundancy pay because they were no longer pursued. No monetary award was made in relation to those claims.
Under Rule 21, the tribunal found that the respondent failed adequately to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The collective complaint succeeded for the claimants listed in the schedule.
Each scheduled claimant also succeeded in a claim for a Protective Award under section 189 of the same Act. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 4 November 2019, being the date on which the first dismissal to which the complaint related took effect. The judgment does not set out a single total monetary figure in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, the claims in respect of notice pay were dismissed as no longer pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | By consent, the claims in respect of statutory redundancy pay were dismissed as no longer pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Trade union | The tribunal found the respondent failed adequately to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | — |
| Trade union | Each claimant listed in the schedule succeeded in a claim for a Protective Award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, with remuneration ordered for a protected period of 90 days from 4 November 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.