Case 1806924/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D O’Dempsey, counsel For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 1806924/2024
- Decision date
- 7 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D O’Dempsey, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the application made on behalf of both claimants to amend their claims in respect of holiday pay. It also recorded that no further amount was due to Ms A Tadych in respect of her wages claim; the written judgment did not determine a holiday-pay claim on its merits.
Professional Care Limited was ordered to pay Mr M Mahboob further unpaid wages of £552 for 1 and 2 June 2024 and £3,726.38 for the suspension period from 4 to 20 June 2024, making £4,278.38 payable gross. Mr Mahboob was responsible for accounting to HMRC for any tax due on that sum.
For wrongful dismissal, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms Tadych £5,056.17 in notice pay and Mr Mahboob £8,468.66 in notice pay. These sums were based on net pay because they were damages for breach of contract. Together with Mr Mahboob’s unpaid-wages award, the payments ordered total £17,803.21 and were to be made within 14 days.
The Tribunal stated that the wrongful-dismissal payments would count towards the £30,000 tax-free lump sum available on termination. They would therefore be taken into account at Remedy Hearing Part II to the extent that any compensatory award made there, together with these payments, exceeded £30,000.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ms A Tadych: the judgment records that no further amount was due in respect of her wages claim; it does not expressly state that the claim was dismissed. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr M Mahboob: £552 for 1 and 2 June 2024 and £3,726.38 for the suspension period from 4 to 20 June 2024, payable gross. | Upheld | — | £4,278 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Ms A Tadych: notice-pay damages based on net pay. | Upheld | — | £5,056 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Mr M Mahboob: notice-pay damages based on net pay. | Upheld | — | £8,469 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,803
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.