Case 1806927/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Cooper v R Greaves Developments Limited HELD in Sheffield by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806927/2024
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Cooper
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the claimant’s reference pursuant to section 11(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Employment Judge Brain found that the claimant’s statement of initial employment particulars should have included the names of the respondent and claimant, the claimant’s employment start date of 17 July 2023, pay of £52,000 gross per annum and £39,401.50 net per annum payable monthly, and holiday entitlement of 28 days per annum including public holidays. The judgment records these matters as particulars that ought to have been included.
The tribunal also found that R Greaves Developments Limited failed to provide written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period from 17 July 2023 to 1 March 2024. The judgment records declaratory findings only and does not record any monetary award or other financial remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Reference under section 11(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that the statement of initial employment particulars ought to have included the names of the respondent and claimant, the claimant’s start date of employment on 17 July 2023, gross annual wage of £52,000, net annual wage of £39,401.50 payable monthly, and holiday entitlement of 28 days per annum including public holidays. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period of employment from 17 July 2023 to 1 March 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.