Case 1806928/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E King v R Greaves Developments Limited HELD in Sheffield by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 1806928/2024
- Decision date
- 18 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Brain on 27 January 2025, found that R Greaves Developments Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs E King's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,076.90, being the amount of that deduction.
The claimant also succeeded on her claim for holiday accrued but untaken at the date her employment ended. The tribunal found that she had accrued 2.46 days' holiday entitlement that had not been taken by termination, and it ordered payment of £302.75 gross in respect of that entitlement.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other substantive claims were recorded in the judgment extract. The total monetary award made by the tribunal was £3,379.65.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the amount deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,077 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded on her claim for payment in respect of holiday accrued but untaken at termination. The tribunal found she had accrued 2.46 days' untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £303 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,380
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.