Case 1806933/2018 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mrs J Foster 2. Mr N Walker v Ongo Homes Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1806933/2018
- Decision date
- 11 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mrs J Foster 2. Mr N Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 February 2019 before Employment Judge Davies, the tribunal dealt with claims brought by Mrs J Foster and Mr N Walker against Ongo Homes Ltd. The judgment records that both claimants withdrew their claims for wrongful dismissal, described as notice pay claims, and their claims for redundancy payments, and those claims were dismissed accordingly.
The tribunal also considered the First Claimant's disability discrimination complaint. It found that Mrs Foster did not have a disability as defined by the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times, and her disability discrimination claim was therefore dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Both claimants' wrongful dismissal (notice pay) claims were dismissed on withdrawal by them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Both claimants' claims for redundancy payments were dismissed on withdrawal by them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The First Claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed because the tribunal found she did not have a disability as defined in the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.