Case 1806977/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Powell v Alpine Window & Door Systems (In Administration) and 4 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806977/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Ms K Powell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 14 September 2020 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The extracted judgment lists the claimant as Ms K Powell and the respondents as Alpine Window & Door Systems (In Administration), Josh Parkin, Ian McIntosh, Ross Bateson (aka Sharp) and Jake Kaye.
The tribunal held that the claims against the second, third and fifth respondents were presented out of time. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and those claims were dismissed.
The extracted text does not identify the substantive nature of the claims or record any remedy award. It therefore only supports a dismissal on time-limit grounds for the respondents named in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. It states that the claims against the second, third and fifth respondents were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.