Case 1806981/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806981/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 20 January 2020 before Employment Judge JM Wade, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his complaints of unfair dismissal, protected disclosure (whistleblowing) detriment and dismissal, and 'other payments'.
Those complaints were therefore dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, nor does it record any monetary award.
The judge noted that the claimant's remaining complaints would proceed to a hearing in May 2020 unless they were otherwise disposed of.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant withdrew this complaint at the preliminary hearing; the judgment records it as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to protected disclosure (whistleblowing) detriment and dismissal; this complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to 'other payments'; this complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.