Case 1807034/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance or v Mr Brill, in-house lawyer — 2024
- Case reference
- 1807034/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance or
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 20 March 2024 before Employment Judge Cox. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr Brill, an in-house lawyer. The judgment also records that the respondent's name was amended to Challenge-TRG Recruitment Limited.
At the preliminary hearing, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that "the claim" was dismissed under Rule 47 at a preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.