Case 1807066/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Levison (Director/Principal Vet) This has been a remote hearing by CVP. A face to face hearing was not held because of the present Covid 19 circumstances. — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807066/2020
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote CVP hearing on 4 February 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Levison, the director/principal vet. The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, failure to pay holiday pay on termination of employment, and notice pay were dismissed.
No separate findings, liability reasoning, or monetary award are set out in the judgment text supplied. The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'notice pay' as part of the complaints dismissed, but does not give any separate reasoning or award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.