Case 1807129/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jackson v Denso Marston Limited AT A HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807129/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP video conference at Leeds on 12 April 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with Mr M Walton appearing for the claimant and Mr P Paget, solicitor, for the respondent. The hearing was by consent and no face-to-face hearing was held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined remotely.
The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal held that Mr D Jackson was fairly dismissed on grounds of redundancy. It therefore rejected the unfair dismissal complaint and recorded that the complaint was not well-founded.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was fairly dismissed on grounds of redundancy and that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.