Case 1807130/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Evans v Meddo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807130/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in respect of unpaid salary and pension contributions, and ordered payment of those sums.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for notice pay. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The tribunal additionally found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment for that amount. The listed hearing on 6 February 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid salary. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,538 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,326
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.