Case 1807131/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Mortimer v 1) Sutton Tools PTY Ltd 2) Sutton Tools UK Ltd 3) Sutton Tools Europe Cooperation UA — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807131/2020
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Mortimer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Anderson at Leeds by CVP on 13 July 2021. The tribunal determined that the Claimant’s employer at the time of his dismissal was the Second Respondent, Sutton Tools UK Ltd.
The judgment records that the claim against the First Respondent, Sutton Tools PTY Ltd, was dismissed because the Claimant withdrew it. The claim against the Third Respondent, Sutton Tools Europe Cooperation UA, was dismissed.
No monetary award is recorded in this judgment, and the document does not decide the substantive merits of any remaining unfair dismissal claim against the Second Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim against the First Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim against the Third Respondent was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.