Case 1807152/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Baer v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807152/2019
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 30 January 2020 before Employment Judge Cox, Ms V Baer brought claims against Tesco Stores Limited for sex discrimination, disability discrimination, notice pay, and a claim under section 99(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written judgment records that the claimant withdrew those claims.
The tribunal therefore dismissed each of those claims on withdrawal. No findings were made on the merits of the allegations, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment was sent to the parties on 31 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment identifies this only as a claim for notice pay and states that it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment identifies this only as a claim under section 99(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and states that it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.