Case 1807157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven King v Automotion CPM Group Limited T/a Carmotion — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807157/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal ordered Automotion CPM Group Limited T/a Carmotion to pay £500 for unpaid wages and £928 for commission as unauthorised deductions from wages. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £428.
The tribunal further held that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed without notice and awarded £576.92, described as one week's wages based on monthly earnings of £2,500 and the statutory minimum notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also made an award of £1,153.85 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written particulars of employment by the time the proceedings were begun.
Finally, the tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay NEST contributions to the relevant pension provider between June and October 2020 and awarded £558.25 for the loss arising. The awards listed in the judgment total £4,145.02.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award comprised £500 for unpaid wages and £928 for commission. | Upheld | — | £1,428 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £428 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages for dismissal without notice, described as one week's wages based on monthly earnings of £2,500 and the statutory minimum notice under section 86 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Other | Award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written particulars of employment by the time proceedings were begun. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failure to pay NEST contributions to the relevant pension provider between June and October 2020. | Upheld | — | £558 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,145
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.