Case 1807158/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Brain This has been a remote hearing by CVP. A face to face hearing was not held because of the present Covid 19 circumstances. — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807158/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr T Lewis, brought claims arising out of the termination of his employment with SR Signs Limited. The tribunal amended the claim by consent to name SR Signs Limited as the correct respondent.
On the redundancy payment reference, the tribunal found that the claimant's redundancy payment entitlement was £7,650. The judgment records that this sum had already been paid by the time of the decision.
The claimant also succeeded in his complaint that notice pay had not been paid, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £510 gross. A further complaint that holiday pay had not been paid on termination also succeeded, and the tribunal ordered payment of £270 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that, on a reference seeking redundancy payment following lay off, the claimant's redundancy payment entitlement was £7,650. The judgment states that this sum had now been paid. | Upheld | — | £7,650 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant succeeded in a complaint of failure to pay notice pay, and the respondent was ordered to pay £510 gross. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded in a complaint of failure to pay holiday pay on termination, and the respondent was ordered to pay £270 gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,430
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.