Case 1807176/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K West v Mrs Helen Hartley trading as Dore Health and Beauty — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807176/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K West
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by video on 26 April 2021 before Employment Judge D N Jones. The claimant, Miss K West, was not in attendance and the respondent, Mrs Helen Hartley trading as Dore Health and Beauty, appeared in person.
The judgment records that the respondent’s name was amended as above. The tribunal then dismissed the claims under rule 47. No substantive findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy assessment are recorded in the text provided.
On the face of the judgment, the only outcome recorded is procedural dismissal of the pleaded claims, namely breach of contract, redundancy pay, unfair dismissal, and unlawful deduction from wages.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 47; no substantive determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under rule 47; no substantive determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 47; no substantive determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47; no substantive determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.