Case 1807190/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Jenkin and others (See attached schedule) v Russell Ductile Castings Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1807190/2024
- Decision date
- 13 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Jenkin and others (See attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found those complaints well founded and therefore made a protective award in respect of all of the claimants listed in the attached schedule.
The judgment states that, for each protective award, the protected period was 90 days beginning on 21 May 2024. It also states that the recoupment regulations apply, with the effect set out in the annex to the judgment. No separate monetary figure is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award in respect of all claimants listed in the schedule. The protected period was 90 days beginning on 21 May 2024; recoupment regulations applied. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.