Case 1807223/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cameron Shaw v Alphadean Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1807223/2022
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cameron Shaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Cameron Shaw brought a claim against Alphadean Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) for unpaid wages and pension deductions. The respondent did not file a response and did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard the claimant’s evidence under affirmation and accepted it as unchallenged, persuasive and cogent.
The tribunal found that Mr Shaw worked for the respondent as a Kitchen Assistant at Handmade Burger Company at Meadowhall, Sheffield, from 1 September 2022 until he gave notice on 15 October 2022, with his last working day on 26 October 2022. A payslip dated 31 October 2022 showed that the respondent accepted he was entitled to pay for 114.5 hours outstanding and unpaid, with a net amount of £1,182.43 after deductions and pension contribution deductions of £30.96.
The respondent’s liquidators suggested that employees had been transferred to another company, but gave no details of the alleged transferee or the date of any transfer. The tribunal accepted neither that suggestion nor any basis for it, and found that Mr Shaw’s employment had not been transferred when it ended and the wages became due.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that there had been an unlawful withholding of pay. It awarded £1,182.43 for unpaid wages and £30.96 for pension deductions not remitted to the pension administrator, making a total award of £1,213.39. The judgment’s operative reasons support that figure, although paragraph 1 of the judgment records a total of £1,213.96.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful withholding of pay for 114.5 hours worked and pension deductions of £30.96 that had been made but not remitted. Paragraph 1 of the judgment records a total of £1,213.96, but paragraph 9 and the detailed reasons record £1,182.43 plus £30.96, giving £1,213.39; the latter appears to be the operative figure. | Upheld | — | £1,213 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,213
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.